Resilience to the worst of humanity
The average person is selfish, greedy, not very intelligent and an emotionally stunted illogical thinker. How can any economic system win the support of the majority if these things are true
–
Any system has to defend against human stupidity which is unlimited. Just look at society and what the average person watches on television.
Any system cannot rely on the best of humanity or values such as integrity, honesty, camaraderie, honour.
I am interested in ideas that are resilient.
The average person has the intellectual reasoning to buy something and wait for something to rise in value. This is the extent of the average person's intellectual abilities. Not in inventing new things or creating something original.
I have retired from design for corporations and I am focusing on design for life and for the planet. I have chosen to focus on the concept of resilience.
In 2015, I incorporated a business that would focus on building leaders to design a resilient society (BLDRS) and called it BLDRS Collective Inc. The corporation hasn’t really succeeded as a business. But the idea has resonated with the Design Science Studio and afforded me the opportunity to participate in the first coheART of this education incubator and initiative of the Buckminster Fuller Institute and habRitual.
I am no expert in resilience. I share the same question, How do we help people learn about syntropy and resilience in a culture that has been designed for entropy and fragility?
與其說普通人是人貪婪的、愚蠢的，不如說是現存的經濟系統和社會體系鼓勵了普通人的貪婪和愚蠢。所以我們要創造個鼓勵發明新事物、獎勵原創、鼓勵誠實……的經濟/社會體系。
同意，[尹與及]，還有一句話，“一分錢一分貨”，這句話在統計上是正確的，所以可以提出一個問題——如何進化出人類價值中最好的特徵。可以執行對進化行爲的技術研究（具有 良好的動畫模擬），並且與該類別相關。
Agree, [尹與及], and there's also a saying, "You get what you reward for," which is statistically true, so the question could be raised, -- how to evolve the features that are the best of human values. The technical research (with good animated simulations) into the behaviors that evolve can be performed, and is relevant to this category.
[+]
我認爲這是非常簡單和基本的。只是讓人們更容易組建和維護當地社區。其餘的將就位。社區是人類的基本需求。一個健康的當地社區將滿足所有其他人類需求，例如食物和住所。讓我們來了解一下基礎知識。這就是我們的技術應該促進的東西，通過自給自足的社區，簡單和人類生存。另外，我真的反對稱大多數人爲愚蠢和自私。當你這樣做時，這就是你會得到的。他們都在同一時間，但都想站在好的一面，社區的一面。那只是連接到我們身上。我們靠在一起才能生存。我們的大腦發育成彼此和平相處。簡單地說，如果你成功地從社區之外提供基本需求，你就會失敗，因爲擁有社區有什麼意義。所以我們都會孤獨和痛苦，就像現在一樣。我們已經有了。
I think it's very simple and basic. Just make it easy for people to form and maintain local communities. The rest will fall in place. Community is a basic human need. a healthy local community will take care of all other human needs, like food and shelter. Let's get to the basics. That's what our tech should facilitate, the simplicity and f human existence, thru self sufficient communities. Also, I really object to calling most people stupid and selfish. When you do, that's what you gonna get. They are all at the same time, but all wanna be on the good side, side of community. That's just wired into us. We survive by clinging together. Our brains develop to live in peace with each other. Simply, if you succeed in providing basic needs from outside the community, you will fail , for what's the point of having the community. So we all gonna be lonely and miserable, just like now. We already have it.
我們真正需要的是一塊土地，形成新的公社，培育更好的文化。建立全新的比修復舊的要容易得多。我們擁有大量技術，但土地始終是最大的問題。簡單地說，所有土地都被少數人佔領，這就是所有苦難的根源。唯一可以幫助它的方法是更多的共享，通過更廣泛地擴展土地。我希望區塊鏈上產生的財富可以用於那個，這是我的希望。
What we really need a s land, to form new communes, nurturing better culture. Building brand new is much easier then fixing the old. We got plenty of tech but land is always the biggest problem. Simply, all land been horded up by just a few people, and that's the root cause of all the misery. The only way it can be helped is by more sharing, by spreading land a little wider. I hope wealth generated on Blockchain can be used for that, that's my hope.
我同意土地是問題所在。它太貴了，利潤動機已經取代了其他所有的土地用途。即使某些東西在社會上有利可圖，金錢激勵也是第一位的。
庇護人們應該是一個充滿愛心的社區或社會的全社會要求。但事實並非如此。利潤是。
I agree land is the problem. It's too expensive and the profit motive has superseded every other use of land. Even if something is socially profitable, the money incentive comes first.
Sheltering people should be a society wide imperative of a loving community or society. But it isn't. Profit is.